Zero-Day Blaster
Trap Normal

Zero-Day Blaster

  • View:
  • 1949




Tribute 1 DARK Link Monster, then target cards on the field equal to its Link Rating; destroy them.




 
 
AI Power Analysis
Removal / NegationConfidence: MediumEvaluated Oct 7, 2026
57± 6/ 100
Power Score
Intrinsic 57
Deck 57

Zero-Day Blaster — Power Evaluation

Final Score: 57 ± 6 · Confidence: Medium

  • Intrinsic: 57 · Deck: 57 · Meta: provisional
  • Primary role: Removal / Negation

Why it scores here

Zero-Day Blaster is a trap whose value is multi-target destruction: it converts a DARK Link Monster tribute into destroying field cards equal to that monster's Link Rating. Its score comes from that removal effect (effect_interaction) and from real deck presence in 67 recent decks, mainly Rokket, with Mirror Force and several Link Dragons as partners. The card is not a material body, and its 1900 view count and high-tier partners did not add points. No combo data exists, so combo_conversion stays low and rests on text alone.

Axis scores

Axis Score Evidence
Accessibility 50 Set trap that needs a DARK Link Monster on the field to tribute; 67 decks run it at an average of 1.73 copies, so it is live but conditional (observed for deck presence, inferred for activation conditions).
Combo & Conversion 35 No recorded boards, so it is a removal trap, not a board builder; any conversion is text-only inference (inferred).
Resource Economy 50 Costs one Link monster and destroys up to the Link Rating in cards, which is roughly even when the target count matches the tribute's rating (inferred from text).
Effect & Interaction 70 Destroys multiple field cards for one trap, scaled by Link Rating, a strong removal shape; no negation or hand-trap reach (verified from text, observed for deck inclusion).
Material Utility 10 Trap card, so it is never used as material and provides no material body (verified from card type).
Resilience & Flexibility 40 Sits face-down and can be negated or stopped by the opponent's interaction; the evidence has no interaction data to measure this (inferred).
Deck-Building Efficiency 60 Single-copy-friendly trap with no garnet or lock; the Link Monster tribute requirement limits it to Link-based decks (observed for copies, inferred for restriction).

Calculation

Weight profile: Removal / Negation profile, single primary role, no secondary blend. Intrinsic ≈ 57, Deck ≈ 57, Meta = provisional. Modifiers: none. Final formula: 0.40*Intrinsic + 0.60*Deck

Strengths

  • Destroys multiple field cards from one trap, scaled by Link Rating
  • Live in 67 recent decks, mostly Rokket (34.3%), so it is a real, played removal option
  • Core partners Mirror Force, Borrelsword Dragon and Absorouter Dragon show a consistent Link-based shell

Weaknesses

  • Needs a DARK Link Monster on the field to tribute, so it is dead without that body
  • Destruction count depends on Link Rating, which is not verifiable from the evidence
  • No combo evidence, so board conversion is unmeasured

Counters / choke points

  • Negation effects that stop the activation or the tribute
  • Floodgates or lines that remove the DARK Link Monster before activation

Best use

Set-up removal trap in Link-based decks, held face-down to answer multi-card boards. Decks: Rokket, Dragon Link, Borrel, @Ignister. Suggested copies: 2.

Evidence & gaps

  • Verified: Trap card that tributes 1 DARK Link Monster and destroys field cards equal to its Link Rating (card text); Formats: TCG, OCG, MasterDuel (evidence.card.formats)
  • Observed: Included in 67 of the recent decks, 91% in gameplay type 7, average 1.73 copies (deck data); Rokket is the dominant home at 34.3% of decks, with Mirror Force and Link Dragons as top partners (deck data)
  • Inferred: Removal and negation role, based on the destroy-by-Link-Rating text; Score of 57 weights removal above conversion because no combo data exists
  • Data gaps: no combos supplied — combo conversion is text-only inference no guides supplied no banlist token — assumed 3 copies (unlimited) no usage statistics (StatisticsCard) — archetype inclusion % inferred from deck sample only Destruction count depends on Link Rating; no link-rating values for the partner Link monsters were supplied











https://metaduelist.com/
Top